صفحة خطأ ):
الصفحة التي تبحث/ي عنها غير موجودة

يمكنك محاولة كتابة كلمة البحث مضبوطه أو الضغط على الزر التالي للعودة للرئيسية



AP Restrictive: WHO spends more on go than on Helps

AP Restrictive: WHO spends more on go than on Helps

The Unified Countries wellbeing organization routinely has spent about $200 million a year on travel costs, more than what it doles out to battle a portion of the most concerning issues in general wellbeing, including Helps, tuberculosis and intestinal sickness combined.LONDON — Dr. Margaret Chan, chief general of the World Wellbeing Association, ventured out to Guinea not long ago to join the nation's leader in praising the world's first Ebola immunization. 

In the wake of commending wellbeing laborers in West Africa for their triumph over the deadly infection, Chan spent the night in the top-level presidential suite at the shoreline side Palm Camayenne lodging. The suite, outfitted with marble lavatories and a lounge area that seats eight, has a promoted cost of 900 euros ($1,008) every night. 

Some say such lavish housing send the wrong message to whatever remains of WHO's 7,000 staff members. 

As per inside reports gotten by The Related Press, the Unified Countries wellbeing office routinely has spent about $200 million a year on travel costs, more than what it doles out to battle a portion of the most concerning issues in general wellbeing, including Helps, tuberculosis and jungle fever combined.Last year, WHO spent about $71 million on Helps and hepatitis. It dedicated $61 million to intestinal sickness. To moderate the spread of tuberculosis, WHO contributed $59 million. Still, some wellbeing programs do get uncommon subsidizing — the organization spends about $450 million attempting to wipe out polio consistently. 

WHO declined to state on the off chance that it paid for Chan's stay at the Palm Camayenne in Conakry, however noticed that host nations at times get the tab for her lodgings. 

When the destitute wellbeing organization is arguing for more cash to reserve its reactions to wellbeing emergencies around the world, it has attempted to get its travel costs under control. Senior authorities have griped inside that U.N. staff members break new decides that were acquainted with attempt to control its broad travel spending, booking advantages like business class plane tickets and rooms in five-star lodgings with couple of outcomes. 

"We don't trust individuals to make the best choice with regards to travel," Scratch Jeffreys, WHO's chief of back, said amid a September 2015 in-house class on responsibility — a video of which was acquired by the AP. 

In spite of WHO's various travel directions, Jeffreys said staff members "can now and then control a tiny bit their travel." The organization couldn't make sure individuals on its finance constantly reserved the least expensive passages or that their travel was even justified, he said. 

"Individuals don't generally comprehend what the best thing to do is," Jeffreys said. 

Ian Smith, official executive of Chan's office, said the seat of WHO's review council said the organization frequently did little to stop mischief. 

"We, as an association, here and there capacity as though principles are there to be broken and that special cases are the administer as opposed to the standard," Smith said. 

Prior that year, an update was sent to Chan and other top pioneers with the headline "Activities TO CONTAIN TRAVEL COSTS" written in capital letters. The notice announced that consistence with guidelines obliging go to be reserved ahead of time was "low." The archive likewise called attention to that WHO was under weight from its part nations to spare cash. 

Travel would dependably be fundamental, the notice stated, however "as an association we should show that we are not kidding about dealing with this fittingly." 

In an announcement to the AP, the U.N. wellbeing office said "the nature of WHO's work frequently requires WHO staff to travel" and that expenses were lessened 14 percent a year ago contrasted with the earlier year — despite the fact that that year's aggregate was especially high because of the 2014 Ebola flare-up in West Africa. 

In any case, staff members still are transparently overlooking the principles. 

An inside examination in Spring, acquired by the AP, found that exclusive two of seven offices at WHO's Geneva central command met their spending targets and presumed that the consistence rate for booking go ahead of time was in the vicinity of 28 and 59 percent. 

Since 2013, WHO has paid out $803 million for travel. WHO's around $2 billion yearly spending plan is drawn from the citizen subsidized commitments of its 194 part nations; the Unified States is the biggest supporter. 

After he was chosen, U.S. President Donald Trump tweeted : "The UN has such awesome potential," however had progressed toward becoming "only a club for individuals to get together, talk, and have a decent time. So miserable!" 

Some wellbeing specialists said while WHO's travel costs watch strange when contrasted with some of its infection spending plans, that doesn't really mean the office's travel costs are swelled. 

Michael Osterholm, an irresistible ailments master at the College of Minnesota, has much of the time been traveled to WHO gatherings — in economy seating — at the office's cost. 

"This may simply address how lost worldwide needs are, that WHO is getting so little for these malady programs," Osterholm said. 

WHO said that about 60 percent of its travel expenses were spent on sending outside specialists to nations and for delegates from part nations to go to their gatherings, as indicated by a press proclamation issued Sunday. 

Amid the Ebola debacle in West Africa, WHO's travel costs spiked to $234 million. Despite the fact that specialists say on-the-ground help was basic, some question whether the organization couldn't have shaved its costs so more finances went to West Africa . The three nations that drag the brunt of the episode couldn't manage the cost of rudiments, for example, defensive boots, gloves and cleanser for imperiled therapeutic laborers or body packs for the thousands who kicked the bucket. 

Dr. Bruce Aylward, who coordinated WHO's episode reaction, piled on almost $400,000 in travel costs amid the Ebola emergency, once in a while flying by helicopter to visit facilities as opposed to going by jeep over sloppy streets, as per inner trek reports he recorded. 

Chan spent more than $370,000 in travel that year, as reported in a private 25-page examination of WHO costs that distinguished the organization's main 50 spenders. Aylward and Chan were first and second on that rundown. WHO declined demands for a meeting with Chan; Aylward did not quickly react to a demand for input. 

Three sources who approached not to be distinguished inspired by a paranoid fear of losing their occupations told the AP that Chan regularly flew in top notch. 

WHO said its travel arrangement, until February, "incorporated the likelihood for the (executive general) to fly with every available amenity." It said Chan flew business class and requested the strategy to be changed to take out the top of the line alternative. 

"There's a gigantic disparity between the general population at the top who are getting helicopters and business class, and every other person who simply needs to manage," Sophie Harman, a specialist in worldwide wellbeing legislative issues at Ruler Mary College in London, said. 

Other universal guide offices, including Specialists Without Fringes, expressly preclude their staff from going in business class. Indeed, even the philanthropy's leader must fly in economy class, a representative said. With a staff of around 37,000 guide laborers versus WHO's 7,000 staff members, Specialists Without Fringes spends about $43 million on travel a year. 

The U.S. Habitats for Sickness Control and Aversion would not give its travel costs, but rather said staff members are not permitted to fly business class unless they have a restorative condition that warrants it. The U.N. youngsters' office UNICEF, which has around 13,000 staff members, said it burned through $140 million on worldwide go in 2016. 

"When you spend the sort of cash WHO is spending on travel, you must have the capacity to legitimize it," Dr. Ashish Jha, chief of the Worldwide Wellbeing Organization at Harvard College, said. "I can't think about any avocation for steadily flying with every available amenity." 

Jha cautioned that WHO's travel spending could have noteworthy results for raising money. Half a month back, WHO requested about $100 million to spare individuals in Somalia from a continuous dry season. In April, it asked for $126 million to stop the helpful disaster in Yemen . 

"On the off chance that WHO is not being as lean as could reasonably be expected, it will be difficult to stay tenable when they make their next subsidizing request," Jha said.

ليست هناك تعليقات:

يمنع نشر التعليقات ذات الروابط الدعائية أو تعليقات بإسلوب غير لائق أو التى تحتوى على معلومات شخصية كالبريد الإلكترونى
أعتذر عن الرد على طلبات التوزيع لضيق الوقت أو التبادل الإعلانى

لتصلك إشعارات ردود هذا الموضوع على البريد الإلكترونى أضف علامة بالمربع بجوار كلمة "إعلامى"

جميع الحقوق محفوظة لــ مدونة بلوجر توب ©